Cultural Dynamics

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanno, D.
Right arrow Articles by Shea, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 176-196 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/092137409200500204

Cognitive Systems of Economic Anthropology

How they are Interrelated with one Another and Located in Social Science

Dai Tanno

The University of Georgia, USA, Keio Gijyuku University, Japan

David Shea

The University of Georgia, USA, Keio Gijyuku University, Japan

A new light of neo-constructivism is cast on the controversy of competing approaches to economic anthropology. The controversy among the competing approaches reveals that they represent some of the major cognitive systems of social science. The cognitive systems are formed in the development of social science over two types of antagonism: (1) the methodological antagonism between individualism and collectivism and (2) the epistemological antagonism between materialism and idealism. An epistemological understanding of the competing approaches to economic anthropology can be achieved by locating them within a broader configuration of the cognitive systems of social science. An examination of the competing cognitive systems of economic anthropology under the new light of neo-constructivism helps us to understand the nature of the theoretical schism of economic anthropology as well as cultural anthropology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?